![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Many years ago I attended a drawing course and we also did nude art. To not offend anyone I am posting only a teaser picture openly, if you want to see the complete pictures (three of a man and four of a woman, standing, lying, sitting...) click the LJ cut. Hope you like them! There are also some links with previous pictures at the bottom of this post. Enjoy!








Other entries about my art:
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/115511.html
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/58498.html
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/37747.html
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/8199.html








Other entries about my art:
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/115511.html
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/58498.html
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/37747.html
http://dieastra.livejournal.com/8199.html
no subject
Date: 2015-04-25 01:43 am (UTC)Ah...feet...I hate drawing feet...and hands. Feet and hands, they are evil to draw!!
no subject
Date: 2015-04-25 04:57 pm (UTC)The female leaning against the table with crossed feet is also my favourite. And her sitting with crossed legs.
I think I also have some sheets somewhere where we drew our own feet and hands, for studying...
no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 05:48 pm (UTC)I recently am letting out my creativity by doing funny picture stories with action figures. My LJ is full of them if you want to have a look.
One time we did "Hamlet" with "Doctor Who" figures. David Tennant, who played the Tenth Doctor, had done this play in real life. There's a DVD. So I took a Doctor figure and changed it into the way his Hamlet looked. It was very modern, in jeans and t-shirt - and barefoot. I used a putty called Milliput to form his naked feet. THAT was quite a hassle!
Here you can see it step by step: http://dieastra.livejournal.com/25776.html
no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 05:52 pm (UTC)I don't like doing just feet or hands, but I could (and have) draw torsos all day long
no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 07:18 pm (UTC)In case I did not mention it, I work in an engineer's office, drawing plans for buildings. So while in a way this is also drawing (now done by computer of course but when I started it was with ink on paper) but there is a more technical accurate side to it, which agrees with me.
Even as a child, when doing coloring books, I NEVER went over the lines ;) I'm too accurate for that. For the same reason, I also enjoy paintings more with a clear picture, where I can recognize what it is about, and not too impressionistic and "modern". Although of course there is the exception of the rule.
We have a pretty famous painting gallery here in Dresden, this is the most famous picture in there: http://www.skd.museum/typo3temp/pics/dffb6a64ad.jpg
The angels on the bottom have become world famous but nobody knows where they are from originally ;)
no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 07:46 pm (UTC)But really, they are everywhere, on cups and such. Too bad our gallery does not get money every time they're used - they would be very rich ;)
no subject
Date: 2015-04-25 02:22 am (UTC)how long did they give you to do each one?
no subject
Date: 2015-04-25 04:53 pm (UTC)Those were very quick sketches, probably 10 minutes each? That's the reason there are no details like faces. It was only about the pose.
no subject
Date: 2015-04-25 09:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-04-25 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-04-26 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-05 10:12 pm (UTC)But I have a good eye and can copy what I see in front of me. As long as it keeps still! I also couldn't draw animals at the zoo as others do, as they move around all the time. You need to be quick for that.